First time buyers receive a great deal of attention at the current time due to the increasing difficulty of making that first step on the property ladder. It is rarely documented however of the difficulties facing homeowners looking to move up the property ladder which is too becoming increasingly difficult.
Recent research shows that the average upscale from a two to a three bedroom property now stands at £27,100. Those looking to upscale from a three to a four bedroom house face the biggest hike in price at £64,032.
As a result of these differences in price, coupled with the fees involved in moving home, more and more people are looking to use homeowner loans to improve & extend their current home to take the effect of upsizing.
When buying a property, many property developers will look at the potential to improve, modify and extend in order to increase the value. This is also a technique now used by many buyers looking at the potential for home improvement.
It can be difficult enough to buy property, with many considerations that must be taken into account. There are many issues that can reduce property value let alone increase it; however the type of property you buy can dictate your ability to improve it or even make any additions at all.
The type of property that best suits improvement will depend on the nature of work you would like to perform. For example, if you are planning to convert a loft in an extra room then it is important that there is enough room to stand up in.
Sometimes the easiest and cheapest way to increase your home’s value is to invest in an improving, up and coming area using a homeowner loan. Signs that an area’s property market is set to improve can be relatively easy to find. These signs may include looking at particular areas or streets that are already popular with buyers. It is often the case that as particular streets or areas increase in value, buyers are priced out of their preferred location, so move as near to it as they can afford.
The important thing to remember is that there is no guarantee that any improvements made on your property will result in an increase in value. Buyers in different locations will be after different things. It is an important consideration to ensure that you are offering potential buyers what they really want. For example a conservatory may be appealing to some but not to others
A good yardstick is often to consult the local estate agents who much a property would be worth subject to improvements being carried out, such as a new kitchen or a conservatory.
Often it’s the smaller, cheaper improvements that can generally offer higher returns than the more expensive ones. The larger and more expensive jobs such as converting your loft or basement may seem appealing to buyers, however they are often unwilling to pay a premium that meets the expense and effort of carrying it out.
The cost of any home improvement and the likely return will vary hugely on the type of property and the area that it’s located. Very few developments come in under budget with the majority coming in over budget. Quote received from builders can often be on the optimistic side. It is therefore prudent to over budget for works
Below is a rough guide of the costs versus the benefits:
Loft conversions:
Cost: £15,000 to £35,000
Potential value increase: £20,000
Difference: – £5,000
A loft conversion must be done properly in order to increase the value of your home. A very important consideration is that it cannot be classed as a loft conversion unless it meets specific building & planning regulations. Your local council will be able to give advice on what those rules are.
Basement conversion:
Cost: £100,000
Potential value increase: £20,000 to £25,000
Difference: – £77,500
A basement conversion is among the most expensive of home improvements. Recouping the initial outlay when selling the property is very difficult let alone making a profit. In some case it can however be very beneficial when selling the property if used as an extra bedroom.
Extension:
Cost: £30,000 to £50,000
Potential value increase: £20,000 to £25,000
Difference: – £17,500
An extension is fast becoming a popular alternative to moving home in order to upsize. You will usually have to sacrifice garden space which can of course have a negative impact on your home’s value. Before commencing with any planned work it is important to consult your local council as there may be restrictions on the height and proximity to boundary lines of any addition.
Off-Road Parking:
Cost: £1,000
Potential value increase: £5,000
Difference: + £4,000
Again, this work requires consultation with the local authority as the job may involve altering the height of the curb. This can prove to be one of the cheapest and most effective improvements that can be carried out.
Conservatory:
Cost: £10,000 to £15,000
Potential value increase: £12,000 to £19,000
Difference: £3,000
Conservatories may not seem quite as attractive in today’s market as they once would have done to the potential buyer. Adding a conservatory is an expensive exercise and would perhaps be best considered for personal use rather than as a tool to increase the value of the property.
Chris Copper Jnr
http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/homeowner-loans-to-add-value-to-your-property-95031.html

9 users commented in " Homeowner Loans To Add Value To Your Property "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback"Honk if I'm paying your mortgage" bumper sticker… I'm sorry am I missing something here?
I didn’t believe the Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan is to make my taxes pay my neighbor’s mortgage payments. I thought my taxes were going to stabilize the housing industry by preventing foreclosures by readjusting mortgage amounts back to a socially acceptable 38% of a families income, or if that wasn’t enough the government would pitch in 7% to bring it down to 31%, with the difference being made by extending the lease of the mortgage.
For example, my neighbor had to foreclose his condo because he had applied for an ARM (which he now knows is unwise, he hadn’t learned or god forbid been told by the lender what that meant) and got a $330,000 loan. He made his payments on time, $1600 a month for the first two years (they were interest only). Two years later, his interest rates readjusted to make his monthly mortgage payment $3200, while his property value had lost $100,000. He tried paying the $3200 a month, but considering it was just interest on the loan, and rents in the area are $1300, the whole thing was just a huge disillusionment. He tried to get the mortgage company to restructure, but they wouldn’t. He stopped paying, and the company got $95,000 for the property through auction, losing $230,000 in the deal – $25,000 or so that had been repaid.
This, extrapolated across the country, of course made everything extremely unstable, and is only now trying to be contained. For the above example, what I thought would have been extremely wise for Wilshire (the lender) was to take the homeowners documented income, (~5500 a month) make the mortgage 31-38% of that income, fix the interest rate, and extend the terms of the lease to be a 50-year mortgage. Homeowner stays in house, lender doesn’t lose $230,000 and the financial system is better stabilized.
I thought that was very close to Obama’s plan, and so I see this bumper sticker by the Tennessee Republican Party and think it’s irrational, inflammatory, and their head is in the ground.
My question is, am I misinformed, are they misinformed, or are we both wrong?
Thanks to everyone who read the entire post and considered the example.
Wouldn’t you like to know* Is there any proof that we are paying for people’s mortgages other than the costs to refinance them?
xiphos* I don’t have any problem with what I explained. I think it should have been done over a year ago to stabilize financial flows. Mortgage fraud was horrendous in my area. I still have yet to see any proof that my tax dollars will pay my neighbors mortgage instead of their income.
If they are not using tax dollars to refinance the loans, and paying a 3rd outright, then I have a problem with that. Yet, I read the Foreclosure prevention act and I didn’t see the government offering any more than 7%.
Plowboy* Congratulations, I also bought a condo 30 year-fixed, 20% down, at a 3rd of my income. But where do you get off with that murderer crap? pendejo…
Plowboy, you’ve proven incapable of irrational thought, and if you want to influence others to consider your views as valid, you need to work on that. To link freeing murderers from assisting homeowners who were defrauded, is nothing more than verbal vomit.
Two words: moral hazard.
References :
No we are paying for other people mortgages who made bad decisions.
References :
You explained it perfectly. Taxpayers are going to subsidize people who behaved foolishly. Do you see a problem with that?
References :
I am a small business owner that has to pay about 40 percent in taxes each year. I own a home and have never been late on a payment. Is it right for my taxes to go up because many people’s greed got the better of them. Of all the people in foreclosure situations, how many have large credit card debt, have taken expensive vacations, or own storage units full of stuff they don’t use.
The bottom line is that responsible people are being penalized because Americans believe that they have the right to wealth, instead of the privilege to earn it. People like your neighbor did not do the proper research when they were making a $330,000 investment. That is nobody’s fault but his own. He should have taken the time and used many resources to see that this was a terrible idea to have a ARM.
Lastly, I know many people that now are considering taking second jobs to help make up for their taxs. Is this helping the economy when we have a large unemployeed sector and a large population with two or more jobs?
The problem with the 50 year mortgage is that it will drive down housing prices and the housing market will forever be changed. This will further hurt homeowners when the look at housing as less of an investment and more of a bill, like a car payment.
References :
your friend made a stupid decision. we ARE paying as now that lender (like so many others) is getting back only a small portion of what was given out. look at the companies on TV saying – i can get your debt down to 65%….. who’s going to pay the other 35%!? the lender will be taking a loss — someone has to pay. I like your idea of the 50 year loan – sadly they are not doing that. realtors and brokers are TELLING people who CAN pay their mortgages – don’ t pay so you can get a short sale and just get out.
References :
Yes you are missing something. It is called intelligence.
Why should I bail out anyone? Are they going to do anything for me? I bought a sensible house with a sensible mortgage, and I am to be punished for it?
I guess you want to free all of the murderers next. Followed by imprisoning law abiding citizens for being law abiding.
Addendum: Where else will it end? If you are going to look the other way for one group, why not another?
I Guess I’lll have to irrationally disagree with a guy who got his panties in a bunch over a "humorous" bumper sticker.
References :
you have a very rational good point, unfortunately republicans are really interested in the bottom line, they believe that corporations that make a profit (no matter how) is a good thing. and to make matters worst, they use this to further the cause by selling bumper stickers.
we are not paying other mortgages, we are giving the mortgage companies the money they lost in these scams. the CEO’s of countrywide have opened another mortgage company, and are now buying up the failed mortgages they financed with countrywide. (see link below)
overall, something has to be done, and we are all in this together. the few greedy people are making us all pay
References :
http://entrepreneur.com/localnews/1609604.html
Wow Plowboy you’re on a role calling everyone stupid on YA tonight. People in glass houses…
OP is completely rational. I think the bumper sticker is a reaction to the Republican party not knowing all the facts of the proposal.
This program is about supporting Loan modifications. We are not paying people’s mortgages. Can you imagine how pissed people would be if their neighbor was chosen for free mortgages?
One thing for sure happened when Obama got elected. The Republicans and conservatives turned incredibly daft and hateful.
References :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loan_modification
Leave A Reply